daniel mendelsohn, why so snarky?

(image from http://malepatternboldness.blogspot.com)

Daniel Mendelsohn takes on the monumental task of critiquing Mad Men here. Almost everything he says makes perfect sense - the understanding of nostalgia as a primary shaping factor for the show, the way in which Weiner leaves many plotlines hanging, the weak treatment of homosexuality and race, the often bland acting, the fetish and over-consumerism now attached to the style of the period and the depth with which children actors really make the show extremely special.

I am so very puzzled, however, by his snarky tone.  There is no real room for it in writing about a show that seems to have gripped the critic and while we are often angry with ourselves for giving in to repulsive television, liking Mad Men could hardly fit that bill. I suspect Mendelsohn is annoyed because of the reverance with which the show has been spoken about until now, as if its a sacred space, untouchable, flawless, perfect. Maybe it is impossible to break that particular hushed sacredness without punching a little hard at it!

With or without the snark, this is still a fabulous analysis! Do read...